Celeron 3215U vs Pentium N3520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N3520
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.74
+2.8%

Pentium N3520 outperforms Celeron 3215U by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25762592
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$107
Current price$270 (1.7x MSRP)$256 (2.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.17 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz1.7 GHz
L1 cache224 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSXno data-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
Smart Connect+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency854 MHz850 MHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes412
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3520 0.74
+2.8%
Celeron 3215U 0.72

Pentium N3520 outperforms Celeron 3215U by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium N3520 1143
+2.2%
Celeron 3215U 1118

Pentium N3520 outperforms Celeron 3215U by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N3520 172
Celeron 3215U 334
+94.2%

Celeron 3215U outperforms Pentium N3520 by 94% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N3520 489
Celeron 3215U 590
+20.7%

Celeron 3215U outperforms Pentium N3520 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 0.72
Recency 1 December 2013 1 June 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $161 $107
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3520 and Celeron 3215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3520
Pentium N3520
Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 79 votes

Rate Pentium N3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 25 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3520 or Celeron 3215U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.