Atom C3338 vs Pentium N3520
Aggregate performance score
Pentium N3520 outperforms Atom C3338 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2989 | 3056 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Pentium | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.92 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 1 December 2013 (12 years ago) | 22 February 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | $27 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Atom C3338 has 50% better value for money than Pentium N3520.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Pentium N3520 and Atom C3338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.17 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 89 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium N3520 and Atom C3338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 8.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3520 and Atom C3338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium N3520 and Atom C3338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3520 and Atom C3338 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3520 and Atom C3338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1333 | DDR4: 1866 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3520 and Atom C3338 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3520 and Atom C3338.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 10 |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 10 |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 4x2.5/1 GBE |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| Recency | 1 December 2013 | 22 February 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 8 Watt |
Pentium N3520 has a 12.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 14.3% lower power consumption.
Atom C3338, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Pentium N3520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3338 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium N3520 is a notebook processor while Atom C3338 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
