Xeon w9-3495X vs Pentium M 780

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 780
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.22
Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
51.63
+23368%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Pentium M 780 by a whopping 23368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking341241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesPentium Mno data
Power efficiency0.346.23
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date25 July 2005 (20 years ago)15 February 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 780 and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Performance-coresno data56
Threads1112
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB105 MB
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size87 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.26V-1.404Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 780 and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 780 and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium M 780 and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 780 and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 780 and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 780 and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 51.63
Recency 25 July 2005 15 February 2023
Physical cores 1 56
Threads 1 112
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 350 Watt

Pentium M 780 has 1196.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3495X, on the other hand, has a 23368.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and 5500% more physical cores and 11100% more threads.

The Intel Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 780 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium M 780 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 780
Pentium M 780
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 25 votes

Rate Pentium M 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 184 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium M 780 and Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.