Turion 64 ML-34 vs Pentium M 780

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 780
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.24
+33.3%
Turion 64 ML-34
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.18

Pentium M 780 outperforms Turion 64 ML-34 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 780 and Turion 64 ML-34 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31833263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MTurion 64
Power efficiency0.840.49
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date25 July 2005 (19 years ago)10 March 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 780 and Turion 64 ML-34 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache32 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size87 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 million114 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.26V-1.404Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 780 and Turion 64 ML-34 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479754
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 780 and Turion 64 ML-34. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 780 and Turion 64 ML-34 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 780 and Turion 64 ML-34 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 780 and Turion 64 ML-34. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 780 0.24
+33.3%
Turion 64 ML-34 0.18

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 780 933
+34.4%
Turion 64 ML-34 694

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 0.18
Recency 25 July 2005 10 March 2005
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 35 Watt

Pentium M 780 has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 29.6% lower power consumption.

The Pentium M 780 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-34 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 780 and Turion 64 ML-34, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 780
Pentium M 780
AMD Turion 64 ML-34
Turion 64 ML-34

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 23 votes

Rate Pentium M 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Turion 64 ML-34 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 780 or Turion 64 ML-34, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.