Celeron G1101 vs Pentium M 765
Aggregate performance score
Celeron G1101 outperforms Pentium M 765 by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3450 | 2993 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.97 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Pentium M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.40 | 0.36 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 20 October 2004 (21 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $85 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 765 and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 0.27 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | 382 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.988-1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 765 and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | FCLGA1156 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 73 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| vPro | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | 32 Bit | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 765 and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16.38 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 17 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel HD |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium M 765 and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron G1101.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 0.62 |
| Recency | 20 October 2004 | 7 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 73 Watt |
Pentium M 765 has 942.9% lower power consumption.
Celeron G1101, on the other hand, has a 210% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Celeron G1101 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 765 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium M 765 is a notebook processor while Celeron G1101 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
