Atom N280 vs Pentium M 765

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 765
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.22
+120%
Atom N280
2009
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.10

Pentium M 765 outperforms Atom N280 by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and Atom N280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31923380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.993.77
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)1 February 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and Atom N280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate400 MHz666.66 MT/s
Multiplierno data10
L1 cache32 KB56 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size87 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors144 million47 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.988-1.356V0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and Atom N280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Atom N280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and Atom N280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Atom N280 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Atom N280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 765 0.22
+120%
Atom N280 0.10

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 765 1834
+223%
Atom N280 567

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 765 864
+70.4%
Atom N280 507

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 0.10
Recency 20 October 2004 1 February 2009
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 2 Watt

Pentium M 765 has a 120% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom N280, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

The Pentium M 765 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N280 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Atom N280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
Intel Atom N280
Atom N280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 30 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or Atom N280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.