Xeon D-1715TER vs Pentium M 735
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-1715TER outperforms Pentium M 735 by a whopping 2929% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3523 | 1352 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Pentium M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.34 | 4.38 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 10 May 2004 (21 years ago) | 24 February 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 735 and Xeon D-1715TER basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 10 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.988V-1.34V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 735 and Xeon D-1715TER compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCBGA2227 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and Xeon D-1715TER. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Pentium M 735 and Xeon D-1715TER technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and Xeon D-1715TER are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and Xeon D-1715TER. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 384 GB |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 735 and Xeon D-1715TER.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 5.15 |
| Recency | 10 May 2004 | 24 February 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 50 Watt |
Pentium M 735 has 614.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-1715TER, on the other hand, has a 2929.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon D-1715TER is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 735 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium M 735 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1715TER is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
