Pro A6-8500B vs Pentium M 735

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 735
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18
Pro A6-8500B
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.01
+461%

Pro A6-8500B outperforms Pentium M 735 by a whopping 461% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32622467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency0.816.37
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date10 May 2004 (20 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm28 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 million3100 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478FP4
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3/DDR3L-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data256
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 1.01
Recency 10 May 2004 3 June 2015
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium M 735 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Pro A6-8500B, on the other hand, has a 461.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Pro A6-8500B is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 735 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 735 and Pro A6-8500B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735
AMD Pro A6-8500B
Pro A6-8500B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Pro A6-8500B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 735 or Pro A6-8500B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.