Core 2 Duo E4300 vs Pentium M 735
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo E4300 outperforms Pentium M 735 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3514 | 3297 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Pentium M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.34 | 0.22 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Allendale (2006−2009) |
| Release date | 10 May 2004 (21 years ago) | July 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo E4300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | 111 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | 167 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.988V-1.34V | 0.85V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo E4300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo E4300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | - |
Security technologies
Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo E4300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo E4300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo E4300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 0.33 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 65 Watt |
Pentium M 735 has 828.6% lower power consumption.
Core 2 Duo E4300, on the other hand, has a 94.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 735 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium M 735 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Duo E4300 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
