Pentium III 1400S vs Pentium M 725
Aggregate performance score
Pentium M 725 outperforms Pentium III 1400S by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 725 and Pentium III 1400S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3249 | 3345 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Pentium M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.81 | 0.35 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Tualatin (2000−2002) |
| Release date | 23 June 2004 (20 years ago) | January 2002 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 725 and Pentium III 1400S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | 80 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | 44 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.988V-1.34V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 725 and Pentium III 1400S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | 370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 32 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 725 and Pentium III 1400S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 725 and Pentium III 1400S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 725 and Pentium III 1400S are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 725 and Pentium III 1400S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.18 | 0.12 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 32 Watt |
Pentium M 725 has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 357.1% lower power consumption.
The Pentium M 725 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium III 1400S in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium M 725 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 1400S is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 725 and Pentium III 1400S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
