PRO A8-9600 vs Pentium M 725

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 725
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.16

PRO A8-9600 outperforms Pentium M 725 by a whopping 1075% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35482159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesPentium Mno data
Power efficiency0.823.10
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date23 June 2004 (21 years ago)3 October 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB2048 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm28 nm
Die size87 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors144 million3,100 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478AM4
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 1.88
Recency 23 June 2004 3 October 2016
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium M 725 has 828.6% lower power consumption.

PRO A8-9600, on the other hand, has a 1075% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD PRO A8-9600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 725 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium M 725 is a notebook processor while PRO A8-9600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 725
Pentium M 725
AMD PRO A8-9600
PRO A8-9600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Pentium M 725 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 37 votes

Rate PRO A8-9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium M 725 and PRO A8-9600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.