Celeron M 330 vs Pentium M 725
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 725 and Celeron M 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Pentium M | Celeron M |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Banias (2003) |
Release date | June 2004 (20 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 725 and Celeron M 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Bus support | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
L1 cache | 32 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 84 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 725 and Celeron M 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | 479 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 21 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron M 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
ECC memory support | - | - |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
Pentium M 725 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium M 725 and Celeron M 330. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 725 and Celeron M 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.