Atom N435 vs Pentium M 725
Aggregate performance score
Pentium M 725 outperforms Atom N435 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3576 | 3698 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.32 | 0.76 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Pinetrail (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 23 June 2004 (21 years ago) | 2 June 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 725 and Atom N435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.988V-1.34V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 725 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 725 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 725 and Atom N435 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 725 and Atom N435 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 725 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 0.09 |
| Recency | 23 June 2004 | 2 June 2011 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 5 Watt |
Pentium M 725 has a 77.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Atom N435, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
The Intel Pentium M 725 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N435 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
