Mobile Sempron 3000+ vs Pentium M 705

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 705
1 core / 1 thread, 24 Watt
0.14
Mobile Sempron 3000+
1 core / 1 thread, 256 Watt
0.15
+7.1%

Mobile Sempron 3000+ outperforms Pentium M 705 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35903562
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MMobile Sempron
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Paris
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 705 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz800 MHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nmno data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.956V-1.484Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 705 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketH-PBGA479, PPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt256 KB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 705 and Mobile Sempron 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 705 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 705 and Mobile Sempron 3000+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 0.15
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 256 Watt

Pentium M 705 has 966.7% lower power consumption.

Mobile Sempron 3000+, on the other hand, has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Pentium M 705 and AMD Mobile Sempron 3000+.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 705
Pentium M 705
AMD Mobile Sempron 3000+
Mobile Sempron 3000+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium M 705 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium M 705 and Mobile Sempron 3000+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.