Celeron N2940 vs Pentium J3710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium J3710
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.92
+39.4%
Celeron N2940
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.66

Pentium J3710 outperforms Celeron N2940 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25182742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Power efficiency13.398.92
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date10 January 2016 (8 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed2.64 GHz2.25 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.32 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency740 MHz854 MHz
Execution Units18no data
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revision2.0/3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports52
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports55
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium J3710 0.92
+39.4%
Celeron N2940 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium J3710 1456
+39.5%
Celeron N2940 1044

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium J3710 195
+16.8%
Celeron N2940 167

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium J3710 561
+12%
Celeron N2940 501

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 0.66
Recency 10 January 2016 22 May 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 7 Watt

Pentium J3710 has a 39.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Pentium J3710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2940 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium J3710 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2940 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium J3710 and Celeron N2940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium J3710
Pentium J3710
Intel Celeron N2940
Celeron N2940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 218 votes

Rate Pentium J3710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 106 votes

Rate Celeron N2940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium J3710 or Celeron N2940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.