Celeron M 333 vs Pentium III 1133
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3535 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.23 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Tualatin (2000−2002) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | July 2000 (25 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium III 1133 and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.13 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 80 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 44 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium III 1133 and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 370 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 29 Watt | 5 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 29 Watt | 5 Watt |
Celeron M 333 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 480% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium III 1133 and Intel Celeron M 333. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium III 1133 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 333 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
