Xeon Phi 3110X vs Pentium III 1000S

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium III 1000S and Xeon Phi 3110X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameTualatin (2000−2002)Knights Corner (2012−2014)
Release dateJune 2001 (23 years ago)12 November 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium III 1000S and Xeon Phi 3110X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)61 (Henihexaconta-Core)
Threads1244
Boost clock speed1 GHz1.05 GHz
L1 cache8 KB32 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm22 nm
Die size80 mm2350 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors44 million5,000 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium III 1000S and Xeon Phi 3110X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket370PCIe x16
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium III 1000S and Xeon Phi 3110X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Pentium III 1000S and Xeon Phi 3110X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium III 1000S and Xeon Phi 3110X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium III 1000S and Xeon Phi 3110X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 61
Threads 1 244
Chip lithography 130 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 300 Watt

Pentium III 1000S has 900% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 3110X, on the other hand, has 6000% more physical cores and 24300% more threads, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium III 1000S and Xeon Phi 3110X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium III 1000S is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 3110X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium III 1000S and Xeon Phi 3110X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium III 1000S
Pentium III 1000S
Intel Xeon Phi 3110X
Xeon Phi 3110X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Pentium III 1000S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Phi 3110X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium III 1000S or Xeon Phi 3110X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.