Atom E3825 vs D510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D510
2009
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.26
+8.3%
Atom E3825
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.24

Atom D510 outperforms Atom E3825 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D510 and Atom E3825 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31553175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAtom
Power efficiency1.883.77
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date21 December 2009 (14 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$73

Detailed specifications

Atom D510 and Atom E3825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz1.33 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom D510 and Atom E3825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D510 and Atom E3825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D510 and Atom E3825 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D510 and Atom E3825 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D510 and Atom E3825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D510 0.26
+8.3%
Atom E3825 0.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D510 406
+7.4%
Atom E3825 378

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.24
Recency 21 December 2009 8 October 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 6 Watt

Atom D510 has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Atom E3825, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 116.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom D510 and Atom E3825.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D510 and Atom E3825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D510
Atom D510
Intel Atom E3825
Atom E3825

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 52 votes

Rate Atom D510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Atom E3825 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D510 or Atom E3825, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.