Celeron 3865U vs Pentium Gold 4417U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Gold 4417U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.09
+146%

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18022473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameKaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019)Kaby Lake-U
Release date15 February 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$107
Current price$423 (2.6x MSRP)$296 (2.8x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1356,FC-BGA1356FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP--
Smart Response++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memory32 GB32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency950 MHz900 MHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1210

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Gold 4417U 2.09
+146%
Celeron 3865U 0.85

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium Gold 4417U 3240
+145%
Celeron 3865U 1320

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 145% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium Gold 4417U 427
+8.9%
Celeron 3865U 392

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 9% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium Gold 4417U 892
+29.1%
Celeron 3865U 691

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 29% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium Gold 4417U 3570
+25.1%
Celeron 3865U 2853

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 25% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium Gold 4417U 8012
+47.7%
Celeron 3865U 5425

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 48% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium Gold 4417U 21.15
+86.1%
Celeron 3865U 39.36

Celeron 3865U outperforms Pentium Gold 4417U by 86% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pentium Gold 4417U 3
+54.8%
Celeron 3865U 2

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 55% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium Gold 4417U 228
+60.6%
Celeron 3865U 142

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 61% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium Gold 4417U 89
+23.6%
Celeron 3865U 72

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 24% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pentium Gold 4417U 1.08
+25.6%
Celeron 3865U 0.86

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 26% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium Gold 4417U 1.4
+72.8%
Celeron 3865U 0.8

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 73% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium Gold 4417U 1792
+61.7%
Celeron 3865U 1108

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 62% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium Gold 4417U 16
+43.9%
Celeron 3865U 11

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 44% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium Gold 4417U 81
+49.1%
Celeron 3865U 54

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 49% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium Gold 4417U 4882
+51.4%
Celeron 3865U 3224

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 51% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium Gold 4417U 2254
+22.3%
Celeron 3865U 1843

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 22% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium Gold 4417U 5280
+45.6%
Celeron 3865U 3627

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 46% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Pentium Gold 4417U 5029
+41.1%
Celeron 3865U 3564

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 41% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Pentium Gold 4417U 2599
+19.1%
Celeron 3865U 2182

Pentium Gold 4417U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 19% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 0.85
Recency 15 February 2019 3 January 2017
Threads 4 2
Cost $161 $107

The Pentium Gold 4417U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3865U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Gold 4417U and Celeron 3865U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Gold 4417U
Pentium Gold 4417U
Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 389 votes

Rate Pentium Gold 4417U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 99 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Gold 4417U or Celeron 3865U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.