Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Pentium G640

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G640
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.85
+39.3%
Athlon 64 FX-74
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.61

Pentium G640 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-74 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25612782
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.020.13
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.240.46
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date3 June 2012 (12 years ago)November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 64 FX-74 has 550% better value for money than Pentium G640.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size131 mm2235 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155F
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G640 0.85
+39.3%
Athlon 64 FX-74 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G640 1349
+38.8%
Athlon 64 FX-74 972

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 0.61
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Pentium G640 has a 39.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Pentium G640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-74 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G640 and Athlon 64 FX-74, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G640
Pentium G640
AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 103 votes

Rate Pentium G640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G640 or Athlon 64 FX-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.