Pentium Dual SU4100 vs Pentium G630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G630
2011, $100
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.77
+166%
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.29

Pentium G630 outperforms Pentium Dual Core SU4100 by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28573380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency1.27no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 September 2011 (14 years ago)1 September 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium G630 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G630 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt2 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G630 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium G630 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G630 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G630 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G630 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G630 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium G630 0.77
+166%
Pentium Dual SU4100 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium G630 1354
+168%
Samples: 841
Pentium Dual SU4100 506
Samples: 200

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.29
Recency 4 September 2011 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 2 Watt

Pentium G630 has a 165.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium Dual SU4100, on the other hand, has 3150% lower power consumption.

The Intel Pentium G630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G630 is a desktop processor while Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G630
Pentium G630
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Pentium Dual Core SU4100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 395 votes

Rate Pentium G630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 5 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core SU4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium G630 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.