i7-620UM vs Pentium G630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G630
2011, $100
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.77
+24.2%
Core i7-620UM
2010, $278
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.62

Pentium G630 outperforms Core i7-620UM by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28553014
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.080.02
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency1.27no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date4 September 2011 (14 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100$278

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium G630 has 300% better value for money than i7-620UM.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium G630 and Core i7-620UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C105 °C
Number of transistors504 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G630 and Core i7-620UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G630 and Core i7-620UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Pentium G630 and Core i7-620UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G630 and Core i7-620UM are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G630 and Core i7-620UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G630 and Core i7-620UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G630 and Core i7-620UM.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium G630 0.77
+24.2%
i7-620UM 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium G630 1354
+24.1%
Samples: 840
i7-620UM 1091
Samples: 14

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.62
Recency 4 September 2011 7 January 2010
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

Pentium G630 has a 24.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

i7-620UM, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 261.1% lower power consumption.

The Intel Pentium G630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-620UM in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G630 is a desktop processor while Core i7-620UM is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G630
Pentium G630
Intel Core i7-620UM
Core i7-620UM

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 395 votes

Rate Pentium G630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 13 votes

Rate Core i7-620UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium G630 and Core i7-620UM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.