Celeron G1101 vs Pentium G620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G620
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.78
+11.4%

Pentium G620 outperforms Celeron G1101 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25232597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.430.97
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date22 May 2011 (13 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60$85
Current price$73 (1.2x MSRP)$40 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium G620 has 666% better value for money than Celeron G1101.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz0.27 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16.38 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G620 0.78
+11.4%
Celeron G1101 0.70

Pentium G620 outperforms Celeron G1101 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium G620 1211
+11.5%
Celeron G1101 1086

Pentium G620 outperforms Celeron G1101 by 12% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 0.70
Recency 22 May 2011 7 January 2010
Cost $60 $85
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 73 Watt

The Pentium G620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1101 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G620 and Celeron G1101, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G620
Pentium G620
Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 470 votes

Rate Pentium G620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G620 or Celeron G1101, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.