Celeron G1610 vs Pentium G4400

Primary Details

Comparing Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1949	2357
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.61	0.06
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Pentium	no data
Architecture codename	Skylake (2015−2016)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date	1 September 2015 (8 years ago)	3 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$64	$388
Current price	$66 (1x MSRP)	$104 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium G4400 has 917% better value for money than Celeron G1610.

Detailed Specifications

Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	3.3 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.3 GHz	2.6 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	3 MB	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Die size	150 mm2	94 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	65 °C	65 °C
Number of transistors	1,400 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1151	FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
TSX	-	no data
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
SIPP	-	no data
Status	Launched	Discontinued

Security technologies

Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	-
MPX	-	no data
Identity Protection	+	no data
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	-	no data
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	-
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3, DDR4	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	34.1 GB/s	21 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics 510	Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory	64 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	-
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	1.05 GHz
InTru 3D	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	3
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
DVI	+	no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	+	no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	4096x2304@24Hz	no data
Max resolution over eDP	4096x2304@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over DisplayPort	4096x2304@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over VGA	N/A	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G4400 outperforms Celeron G1610 by 70% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Performance score	1.67	0.98
Recency	1 September 2015	3 December 2012
Cost	$64	$388
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	55 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G4400 and Celeron G1610, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---