Celeron G3900 vs Pentium G3220

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pentium G3220
2013
2 cores / 2 threads
1.24
Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads
1.42
+14.5%

Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G3220 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21982083
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.132.83
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years old)1 September 2015 (8 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$71$42
Current price$103 (1.5x MSRP)$56 (1.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3900 has 2077% better value for money than Pentium G3220.

Technical specs

Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2150 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C65 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP--
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 510
Max video memory1.7 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz950 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60HzN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/1212
OpenGL4.34.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900.

PCIe versionUp to 3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G3220 1.24
Celeron G3900 1.42
+14.5%

Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G3220 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium G3220 1892
Celeron G3900 2180
+15.2%

Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G3220 by 15% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium G3220 525
Celeron G3900 580
+10.5%

Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G3220 by 10% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium G3220 888
Celeron G3900 992
+11.7%

Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G3220 by 12% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Pentium G3220 2940
Celeron G3900 3040
+3.4%

Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G3220 by 3% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.24 1.42
Recency 1 September 2013 1 September 2015
Cost $71 $42
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 51 Watt

The Celeron G3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G3220 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3220 and Celeron G3900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3220
Pentium G3220
Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 315 votes

Rate Intel Pentium G3220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 189 votes

Rate Intel Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3220 or Celeron G3900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.