Ultra 7 265K vs Pentium E6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E6300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.67
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
39.11
+5737%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Pentium E6300 by a whopping 5737% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E6300 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking274382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.5992.37
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.9428.53
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date9 May 2009 (15 years ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 7 265K has 2473% better value for money than Pentium E6300.

Detailed specifications

Pentium E6300 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size82 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E6300 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA7751851
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E6300 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Pentium E6300 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E6300 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E6300 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E6300 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E6300 0.67
Ultra 7 265K 39.11
+5737%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E6300 1032
Ultra 7 265K 59860
+5700%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 39.11
Recency 9 May 2009 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Pentium E6300 has 92.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 5737.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E6300 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E6300
Pentium E6300
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 77 votes

Rate Pentium E6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 54 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E6300 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.