Pentium J2850 vs Pentium E5800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E5800
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.74
+15.6%
Pentium J2850
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.64

Pentium E5800 outperforms Pentium J2850 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26802772
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.38no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Power efficiency1.086.05
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date28 November 2010 (14 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$68$94

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E5800 0.74
+15.6%
Pentium J2850 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E5800 1175
+15.6%
Pentium J2850 1016

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 0.64
Recency 28 November 2010 1 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

Pentium E5800 has a 15.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Pentium J2850, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

The Pentium E5800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium J2850 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium E5800 is a desktop processor while Pentium J2850 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5800 and Pentium J2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5800
Pentium E5800
Intel Pentium J2850
Pentium J2850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 424 votes

Rate Pentium E5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Pentium J2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E5800 or Pentium J2850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.