EPYC 72F3 vs Pentium E5800

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E5800
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.76
EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
17.81
+2243%

EPYC 72F3 outperforms Pentium E5800 by a whopping 2243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E5800 and EPYC 72F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2666368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.384.32
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.079.02
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date28 November 2010 (13 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$68$2,468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium E5800 has 25% better value for money than EPYC 72F3.

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5800 and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size82 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5800 and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5800 and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Pentium E5800 and EPYC 72F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5800 and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5800 and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5800 and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E5800 0.76
EPYC 72F3 17.81
+2243%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E5800 1164
EPYC 72F3 27252
+2241%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 17.81
Recency 28 November 2010 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

Pentium E5800 has 176.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 72F3, on the other hand, has a 2243.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 72F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E5800 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium E5800 is a desktop processor while EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5800 and EPYC 72F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5800
Pentium E5800
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 403 votes

Rate Pentium E5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E5800 or EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.