Atom N435 vs Pentium E5800
Aggregate performance score
Pentium E5800 outperforms Atom N435 by a whopping 644% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2958 | 3673 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.38 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.11 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Pinetrail (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 28 November 2010 (15 years ago) | 2 June 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $68 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Pentium E5800 and Atom N435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium E5800 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 512 KB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5800 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium E5800 and Atom N435 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5800 and Atom N435 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5800 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5800 and Atom N435.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.67 | 0.09 |
| Recency | 28 November 2010 | 2 June 2011 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 512 Watt |
Pentium E5800 has a 644.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, and 687.7% lower power consumption.
Atom N435, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.
The Intel Pentium E5800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N435 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium E5800 is a desktop processor while Atom N435 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
