Athlon II X2 240 vs Pentium E5700

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E5700
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.68
+3%
Athlon II X2 240
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.66

Pentium E5700 outperforms Athlon II X2 240 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27222742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.013.28
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.990.96
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date8 August 2010 (14 years ago)23 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$110$35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X2 240 has 32700% better value for money than Pentium E5700.

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size82 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E5700 0.68
+3%
Athlon II X2 240 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E5700 1081
+3.7%
Athlon II X2 240 1042

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium E5700 324
+9.8%
Athlon II X2 240 295

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium E5700 520
+3%
Athlon II X2 240 505

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.66
Recency 8 August 2010 23 July 2009

Pentium E5700 has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5700 and Athlon II X2 240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5700
Pentium E5700
AMD Athlon II X2 240
Athlon II X2 240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 940 votes

Rate Pentium E5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 383 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E5700 or Athlon II X2 240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.