Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Pentium E5400
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8160 outperforms Pentium E5400 by a whopping 2827% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium E5400 and Xeon Platinum 8160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2795 | 336 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.46 | 3.40 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | 0.90 | 11.45 |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 18 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 25 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | $4,702 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Pentium E5400 has 149% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8160.
Detailed specifications
Pentium E5400 and Xeon Platinum 8160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 33 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium E5400 and Xeon Platinum 8160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5400 and Xeon Platinum 8160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Pentium E5400 and Xeon Platinum 8160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5400 and Xeon Platinum 8160 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5400 and Xeon Platinum 8160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5400 and Xeon Platinum 8160.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.62 | 18.15 |
| Recency | 18 January 2009 | 25 April 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
Pentium E5400 has 130.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8160, on the other hand, has a 2827.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Platinum 8160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E5400 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium E5400 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8160 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5400 and Xeon Platinum 8160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
