Celeron 887 vs Pentium E5400
Primary details
Comparing Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2679 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.46 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | January 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 October 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | $86 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 775 | BGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Pentium E5400 outperforms Celeron 887 by 29% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Pentium E5400 outperforms Celeron 887 by 9% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron 887 outperforms Pentium E5400 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Celeron 887 has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium E5400 is a desktop processor while Celeron 887 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5400 and Celeron 887, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
