Atom D525 vs Pentium E5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E5200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.59
+136%
Atom D525
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.25

Pentium E5200 outperforms Atom D525 by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E5200 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28153162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.861.82
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5200 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size82 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Number of transistors228 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5200 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5200 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium E5200 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5200 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5200 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E5200 0.59
+136%
Atom D525 0.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E5200 937
+132%
Atom D525 404

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium E5200 284
+269%
Atom D525 77

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium E5200 452
+142%
Atom D525 187

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 0.25
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 13 Watt

Pentium E5200 has a 136% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Pentium E5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D525 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium E5200 is a desktop processor while Atom D525 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5200 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5200
Pentium E5200
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 293 votes

Rate Pentium E5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 218 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E5200 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.