Ultra 7 265K vs Pentium Dual T4400

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T4400
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.81
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.28
+4502%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Pentium Dual Core T4400 by a whopping 4502% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T4400 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking259086
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data89.89
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual Coreno data
Power efficiency2.1928.22
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 December 2009 (14 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T4400 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size107 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors410 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T4400 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketP1851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4400 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Pentium Dual Core T4400 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T4400 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T4400 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T4400 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual T4400 0.81
Ultra 7 265K 37.28
+4502%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T4400 1284
Ultra 7 265K 59223
+4512%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 37.28
Recency 1 December 2009 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Pentium Dual T4400 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 4502.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T4400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T4400 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T4400 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400
Pentium Dual Core T4400
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 214 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 63 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T4400 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.