Celeron J1900 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300
Aggregate performance score
Pentium Dual T4300 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2566 | 2616 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Pentium Dual Core | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 November 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $82 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.42 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 224 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | P | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel HD Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron J1900.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.80 | 0.75 |
| Recency | 1 April 2009 | 1 November 2013 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Pentium Dual T4300 has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron J1900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron J1900.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
