Athlon II P320 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Athlon II P320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2510not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreAMD Athlon II
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date1 June 2009 (15 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$58 $126

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Athlon II P320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus support800 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Athlon II P320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478S1g4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Athlon II P320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVM

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium Dual T4300 1232
+75.5%
Athlon II P320 702

Pentium Dual Core T4300 outperforms Athlon II P320 by 75% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium Dual T4300 2242
+26.2%
Athlon II P320 1776

Pentium Dual Core T4300 outperforms Athlon II P320 by 26% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium Dual T4300 4057
+15.9%
Athlon II P320 3499

Pentium Dual Core T4300 outperforms Athlon II P320 by 16% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium Dual T4300 1825
+9%
Athlon II P320 1674

Pentium Dual Core T4300 outperforms Athlon II P320 by 9% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium Dual T4300 39
Athlon II P320 36.45
+7%

Pentium Dual Core T4300 outperforms Athlon II P320 by 7% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2009 12 May 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Athlon II P320. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Athlon II P320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300
Pentium Dual Core T4300
AMD Athlon II P320
Athlon II P320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 153 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 64 votes

Rate Athlon II P320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T4300 or Athlon II P320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.