Xeon Gold 5218 vs Pentium Dual T4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T4200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.65
Xeon Gold 5218
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
12.22
+1780%

Xeon Gold 5218 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T4200 by a whopping 1780% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2961691
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.47
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency0.794.16
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 January 2009 (16 years ago)2 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,273

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Xeon Gold 5218 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate800 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache128 KB1 MB
L2 cache1 MB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB22 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C87 °C
Number of transistors410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Xeon Gold 5218 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Xeon Gold 5218. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
AMT+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Xeon Gold 5218 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Xeon Gold 5218 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Xeon Gold 5218. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2667
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Xeon Gold 5218.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium Dual T4200 0.65
Xeon Gold 5218 12.22
+1780%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium Dual T4200 1149
Samples: 864
Xeon Gold 5218 21586
+1779%
Samples: 19

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 12.22
Recency 1 January 2009 2 April 2019
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Pentium Dual T4200 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5218, on the other hand, has a 1780% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5218 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T4200 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5218 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200
Pentium Dual Core T4200
Intel Xeon Gold 5218
Xeon Gold 5218

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 137 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 24 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5218 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Xeon Gold 5218, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.