A6-3400M vs Pentium Dual Core T3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T3400 and A6-3400M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2594
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 October 2008 (15 years ago)15 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T3400 and A6-3400M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size143 mm2218 mm2
Number of transistors291 Million1000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T3400 and A6-3400M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FS1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and A6-3400M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and A6-3400M are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T3400 and A6-3400M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6520G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T3400 653
A6-3400M 1191
+82.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium Dual T3400 2026
+34%
A6-3400M 1512

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium Dual T3400 3817
A6-3400M 4922
+29%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium Dual T3400 1779
A6-3400M 2135
+20%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium Dual T3400 38.5
A6-3400M 26
+48.1%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 15 June 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm

A6-3400M has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T3400 and A6-3400M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T3400 and A6-3400M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
Pentium Dual Core T3400
AMD A6-3400M
A6-3400M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 61 vote

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 168 votes

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T3400 or A6-3400M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.