Celeron M U3400 vs Pentium Dual T2390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T2390
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 1 Watt
0.31
+19.2%

Pentium Dual Core T2390 outperforms Celeron M U3400 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33503402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Celeron M
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 March 2008 (17 years ago)24 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz2500 MHz
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size143 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors291 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB512 KB + 2 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium Dual T2390 0.31
+19.2%
Celeron M U3400 0.26

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium Dual T2390 1771
+47%
Celeron M U3400 1205

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium Dual T2390 3331
+43.8%
Celeron M U3400 2317

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium Dual T2390 1470
+48.8%
Celeron M U3400 988

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.26
Recency 1 March 2008 24 May 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 512 Watt

Pentium Dual T2390 has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 51100% lower power consumption.

Celeron M U3400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390
Pentium Dual Core T2390
Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 73 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T2390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M U3400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.