Celeron M 540 vs Pentium Dual T2390

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M 540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreCeleron M
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 March 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M 540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz533 MHz
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M 540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt30 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T2390 568
+4.8%
Celeron M 540 542

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium Dual T2390 1771
+1.5%
Celeron M 540 1744

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium Dual T2390 1470
+83.2%
Celeron M 540 803

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2008 1 October 2007
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 30 Watt

Pentium Dual T2390 has an age advantage of 5 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron M 540, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M 540. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron M 540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390
Pentium Dual Core T2390
Intel Celeron M 540
Celeron M 540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 60 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T2390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Celeron M 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T2390 or Celeron M 540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.