Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 vs Athlon X2 QL-60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-60 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon2x AMD Athlon 64
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Tyler (2007−2009)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)1 November 2009 (14 years ago)
Current price$8.83 $66

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-60 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus support3600 MHz1600 MHz
L1 cache256 KB0 MB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-60 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1Socket S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNow
PowerNow++
VirusProtectno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X2 QL-60 547
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 577
+5.5%

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-60 by 5% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 1 November 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 20 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-60 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-60 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-42, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
Athlon X2 QL-60
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 32 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-60 or Athlon 64 X2 TK-42, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.