Celeron T3500 vs Pentium Dual T2370
Aggregate performance score
Celeron T3500 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T2370 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3384 | 3174 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Pentium Dual Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.31 | 0.52 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | no data |
| Release date | 1 January 2008 (17 years ago) | 1 July 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T2370 and Celeron T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T2370 and Celeron T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.26 | 0.43 |
| Recency | 1 January 2008 | 1 July 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Celeron T3500 has a 65.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Celeron T3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
