Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Pentium Dual T2130
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms Pentium Dual Core T2130 by a whopping 1177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3462 | 1884 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Pentium Dual Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.18 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Thuban (2010) |
| Release date | no data | 1 May 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T2130 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 346 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 904 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T2130 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 95 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T2130 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T2130 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T2130 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.22 | 2.81 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 95 Watt |
Pentium Dual T2130 has 9400% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), on the other hand, has a 1177.3% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Dual Core T2130 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T2130 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
