Celeron E1500 vs Pentium B960

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium B960
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.62
+59%
Celeron E1500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.39

Pentium B960 outperforms Celeron E1500 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27933017
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency1.680.57
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date2 October 2011 (13 years ago)November 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$63

Detailed specifications

Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C73 °C
Number of transistors504 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium B960 0.62
+59%
Celeron E1500 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium B960 986
+57.5%
Celeron E1500 626

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 0.39
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium B960 has a 59% higher aggregate performance score, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Pentium B960 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E1500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium B960 is a notebook processor while Celeron E1500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium B960 and Celeron E1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium B960
Pentium B960
Intel Celeron E1500
Celeron E1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 517 votes

Rate Pentium B960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 49 votes

Rate Celeron E1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium B960 or Celeron E1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.