Atom N270 vs Pentium 997

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 997
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.51
+467%
Atom N270
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.09

Pentium 997 outperforms Atom N270 by a whopping 467% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 997 and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28833396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.843.41
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$44

Detailed specifications

Pentium 997 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0FSB
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s533.33 MT/s
Multiplier1612
L1 cache64K (per core)56 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors504 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 997 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 997 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium 997 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 997 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 997 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 997 and Atom N270 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 997 and Atom N270.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 997 0.51
+467%
Atom N270 0.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 997 809
+495%
Atom N270 136

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 0.09
Recency 1 September 2012 2 April 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 2 Watt

Pentium 997 has a 466.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has 750% lower power consumption.

The Pentium 997 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 997 and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 997
Pentium 997
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate Pentium 997 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 252 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 997 or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.