Celeron J3355 vs 887

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 887 and Celeron J3355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	2590
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.04
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Celeron
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date	1 October 2012 (11 years ago)	30 August 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron 887 and Celeron J3355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	2 GHz
Bus type	DMI 2.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	15	20
L1 cache	128 KB	no data
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Die size	131 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	504 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 887 and Celeron J3355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 887 and Celeron J3355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	no data	+
FMA	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 887 and Celeron J3355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 887 and Celeron J3355 are enumerated here.

VT-x

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 887 and Celeron J3355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size	16 GB	8 GB
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.335 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	-	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Intel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 887 and Celeron J3355.

PCIe version	no data	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 October 2012	30 August 2016
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	10 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 887 and Celeron J3355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---