Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium 987

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 987
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.41
+95.2%
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.21

Pentium 987 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29943229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency2.280.32
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Newark (2003)
Release date1 February 2013 (11 years ago)August 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128K
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size131 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023754
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 987 0.41
+95.2%
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 987 657
+102%
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 326

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 0.21
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 62 Watt

Pentium 987 has a 95.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 264.7% lower power consumption.

The Pentium 987 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 987 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 987
Pentium 987
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 44 votes

Rate Pentium 987 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 987 or Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.