A10 PRO-7800B vs Pentium 4 P4 3.0
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1846 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Pentium 4 | no data |
Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
Release date | no data | 31 July 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 4096 KB |
Chip lithography | 130 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | no data | 245 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 2,411 million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FM2+ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
PowerTune | - | + |
TrueAudio | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
Out-of-band client management | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
RAID | - | + |
HSA | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-2133 |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
Number of pipelines | no data | 512 |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 130 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 65 Watt |
A10 PRO-7800B has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 36.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 P4 3.0 and A10 PRO-7800B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.