Sempron 3000+ vs Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Aggregate performance score
Sempron 3000+ outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3603 | 3565 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Pentium 4-M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.21 | 0.12 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| Release date | no data | 1 October 2005 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $50 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Sempron 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 144 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Sempron 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 62 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and Sempron 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 62 Watt |
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 has 106.7% lower power consumption.
Sempron 3000+, on the other hand, has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score.
The AMD Sempron 3000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 is a notebook processor while Sempron 3000+ is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
