Xeon E5450 vs Pentium 4 630

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Xeon E5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2081
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesPentium 4no data
Power efficiencyno data1.92
Architecture codenamePrescott 2Mno data
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and Xeon E5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHzno data
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °C67 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4V0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and Xeon E5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPLGA775LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Xeon E5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-+
FSB parity-+

Security technologies

Pentium 4 630 and Xeon E5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Xeon E5450 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+
EPTno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 4 630 272
Xeon E5450 2580
+849%

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon E5450 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 630 and Xeon E5450. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5450 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Xeon E5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
Intel Xeon E5450
Xeon E5450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1284 votes

Rate Xeon E5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 630 or Xeon E5450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.